- 追加された行はこの色です。
- 削除された行はこの色です。
https://bit.ly/3R2Ybkz
https://bit.ly/3yxf3bU
https://bit.ly/3RfuRYr
https://bit.ly/3R4GwsC
https://bit.ly/3R4UqLF
https://bit.ly/3OWp1ZP
https://bit.ly/3yBCa5n
https://bit.ly/3OWp2gl
https://bit.ly/3yzGceo
https://bit.ly/3a9vtOs
https://bit.ly/3OXkare
https://bit.ly/3I7igSM
https://bit.ly/3OS93Qv
111Kari Hurtta November 4, 2011 at 2:14 pm
38Isabel wrote:
- Who else would monitor satellites that measure solar flare activity and the increased cancer risk that come with them?
- What would our physics and biology textbooks look like without their images?
- Would we know that the universe is expanding and by extension, more about our origin as a planet/species if it weren’t for astronauts?
- How would we know about dark matter or black holes or SE remnants?
Uhh. I do not think that this is much do with astronauts. Almost all is done with automatic devices. Remote controlled and autonomous systems rules.
/ Kari Hurtta
112Susan Walsh November 4, 2011 at 2:25 pm
@Kari, Keeper of Acronyms
I missed you! Glad to see you back. It must be about time for your daughter to go to bed. TGIF!
(Thank God it’s Friday)
113Kari Hurtta November 4, 2011 at 2:25 pm
46 YOHAMI wrote:
Intellectual shy nerdy theoretical physicists who barely get the credit for their stuff do all of that.
Yes.
And they dont do it to make the world a better place.
Hmm. Yes.
/ Kari Hurtta
114Kari Hurtta November 4, 2011 at 2:37 pm
@ 112 Susan Walsh, daughter ?